« Another manifesto: The Monstrous Practitioner | Main | A Paranoid-Peripheral Publication for Graphic Design »

February 28, 2006

Shedding the monstrous skin? (With particular reference to The National Grid and something Stuart Bailey said)...

I hope Jonty doesn't mind me putting these images up here, but since writing that previous manifesto I've been flat out working on The National Grid. We're aiming at getting it to print on Monday, and it's been a lot more work than I'd naively imagined. It's been a really enjoyable process though... but I'll come back to that, sort of... (this should possibly be two different posts but I'm sure they're related somehow?)

Anyway last night I was talking with Laurene about where I'm at and what I'm up to. She asked what I meant about the 'shedding the monstrous skin' bit in the manifesto, which lead to an interesting discussion about 'coming out' of the Masters... the idea that the methodology I've engaged (reflective practice) has been quite horrific and I've begun to see myself as a monster... but now how to pull out of that (to not "remain monstrous too long") and through the exegesis look at what I got out of being (or attempting to be) monstrous, how it's changed/affected my practice, and how that might be framed/pitched as a 'contribution to the field'. Emilie also has mentioned my need to tie things down... actually she suggested the 'structure' that she saw here. Which is very useful I think... to know what your research looks like to someone from outside.

I guess I'm beginning to quite like the monster though... but maybe I'm thinking of it as a caricature these days and it's more fun than painful perhaps? I definitely want to do the 'Design Wolf studio visits'... I think that'd totally f*cking rock... or the documentation would anyway. But you see what I mean?

Anyway back to The National Grid and an observation I made while attempting to write my part of the editorial for this first issue... I wrote this:

"This whole endeavor really, is the result of us being at a bit of a loose-end. Neither of us were very good at being real graphic designers, I mean we could 'design' ok, but all that other stuff; time, money, people skills? Why we both ended up in education I guess. But we're not entirely happy there either, and we've often joked around about our best students being unemployable. After dinner with Peter and Stuart I Googled them and I found that interview with Stuart where he mentions something about finding an escape route out of design, whereas I think for us this project has been more about finding a way back in."

I don't know if that'll end up in the publication, esp the bit about 'dinner'? I recently freaked out when I realised that The National Grid was looking and feeling very similar to Dot Dot Dot. That's happened quite unconsciously, Jonty and I have looked at it and talked about it a lot... Jonty didn't care as much as I did, and maybe I'm over reacting. Anyway I thought that way in/way out difference 'thing' was important/interesting. I really like Stuart's writing, a lot of what he says resonates with me in the same way as a lot of music I like does... in the way that makes you go, "Damn I wish I'd played/said that". I enjoy his cynicism and I see that DDD is actually very English now, much more than it is Dutch. Rather than try and explain what I mean about the 'ways in/ways out' I thought I'd just copy parts of the interview in here (it's from Speak Up by the way)... and let it explain itself, it seems pretty obvious... my point being that I think we're talking about the same thing (only he says it really well). What I most like is seeing someone put something you felt so succinctly and perfectly... like dinner's always 'nicer' when somebody else has cooked it for you.

here

Talks about coming from the Netherlands to New York partly because he felt there was no depth there... interesting because I've felt the other way, like coming here was a mistake and that I should have gone to Europe.

"I'm also looking for an escape route from graphic design, which I'm guessing I'm forcing myself into finding... an instinctive phrase; a reflex rather than a plan... sick of hearing myself saying it and trying to work out what it means in practical terms. It's exactly the same as spending two years complaining about wanting to leave Amsterdam. Eventually something gives way and you do it. Geography or work, it's the same thing. Again luckily, I have Dot Dot Dot to work this out with.... you can find a more defined mapping of this disenchantment with graphic design by observing how the magazine has changed."

"I've tried to explain elsewhere how I don't really see graphic design as deserving of being treated as an independent, navel-gazing discipline. It exists entirely in relation to other subjects.... I suspect what I'm really against is what that term "graphic design" has come to represent, i.e. synonymous with business cards, logos, identities and advertising, and, again simply put, those are things I'm just not interested in."

"I think what I do, and what the other people I work with do, is confusing, because it's difficult to place."

"So when I say I'm after an escape route from "graphic design", it's from a "graphic design" defined by those quotation marks, from the self-imposed limitations of what that implies (the self-important "industry" or "profession", its awards and profiles and self-justifying theories...) ... It doesn't start out being a big deal, it only becomes a big deal when a third party - it could equally be a student or a critic - turns it into a big deal."

"That's part of my problem with writing around graphic design: it uses such grand, revolutionary, pompous rhetoric, and in most cases they just don't fit the subject matter. I guess it's because that sort of rhetoric - ideologies, systems, strategies, which seems to ape the language of war and social change - comes from a particular sort of art or architecture writing. When it gets filtered to graphic design, which is mostly everyday and ephemeral, it just doesn't fit right. I find it a bit embarrassing..." [link to the manifesto and evangelism... The Rev. Holden Gunn]

"Although it's true that I've always collaborated on maybe 80% of the work, those collaborations were never planned. I think it's a combination of insecurity and boredom, or to turn those around, it's about the strength of working alongside someone, both confirming or criticizing each other.... You get to places you wouldn't on your own. Will wrote to me recently that a real conversation is one where you genuinely don't know what the other person is going to say next..."

"Well, "choose" is too strong. I know I keep picking at your questions like this, but I think it's important to convey the vagueness with which these things occur..." [I like his vagueness... one of the things that resonates]...
"The clarity only comes in retrospect. At the time they happen without anyone really noticing,..." [noticing in retrospect]

[on working with Will(?)]... "We spent an evening playing each other completely different kinds of music, then decided we should write something together precisely because we were so apparently incompatible"... "The two best pieces of work of anything we've both done are the ones we made together, for precisely the reason that they could have never been made individually. I'm a big believer in those “third ways”, in qualities you can't quite isolate."
..."In Dot Dot Dot 8, Kodwo Eshun wrote: "How fragile it is to form a group, any kind of group. How delicate the task of creating the conditions for a shared belief are." and so it's true: we're on the point of collapse most of the time. " [link to The Grand Saloon... into my enjoying The National Grid project]

"... it's always on the basis of friendships" ... "I made the book Appendix with Ryan Gander, for instance, because we met and got drunk... argued for about eighteen months... The key factor was the trust that all our arguing was leading to a better result."

[on teaching writing] "I'd decided to stop teaching graphic design, partly through feeling a bit uncomfortable teaching something I had doubts about, as expressed above. I realized that what I'd ended up doing after a few years was largely trying to teach writing—I mean in the sense of "designing writing"—disguised as graphic design. That’s fine in itself; I think it's a useful and relevant aspect, and everyone was always cetainly interested..."

"I always relate these things to music, so it's like thinking what's the second album going to be after the rough debut; more studio time, more pressure, bigger egos, drink problems, etc. "

"attempting to convey the more abstract qualities: the vibration, the after-effect, the unexplainable (rather than the inexplicable). In a way it's doomed to failure, but interesting failure. I anticipate ending up with something else altogether, nothing to do with what you were aiming for in the first place. It's about setting up certain conditions to make sure you get lost." [this could have been in my manifesto, re. peripheral!?]

Posted by Luke Wood at February 28, 2006 04:26 AM

Comments

Luke, your musing over DDDs english-ness struck a chord with me. It's interesting to observe Bailey's editorship of Werklaats Typographie's polemic, 'In Alphabertical Order', within which one can find a small 'collection of texts that might be considered its founding ideals', including Froshaug, Potter and Kinross!

Can this english-ness cast any light onto Baliely's seemingly inflammatory observation that the Netherland's is 'a surface society, and as such not a very satisfying place. The international community I know live with a sense of passing through: it�s ephemeral' - or am I missing something?

Posted by: Kim at March 3, 2006 03:52 PM

Yeah, it was largely 'meeting' Peter and Stuart that made me realise its Englishe-ness. Peter seemed very 'international' in that way that many Europeans do, whereas Stuart was just very English I thought (they'd hate us analysing them like this!)... he made me think about Herbert Spencer and Typographica. I guess I could rationalise him (as a writer/designer) following in that tradition. I haven't seen/read that WT book,... but have just ordered it, cheers.

Regarding his dig at The Netherlands, yeah I don't know I've never been there! I'd say the same about New York. Do you think that's an 'English' thing to say? I just thought it meant he was looking for a kind of engagement he was unable to find there... which seems odd being that they did DDD together there?

Posted by: Luke at March 4, 2006 01:54 AM

Your comments on the Englishness of Bailey mirror my own, especially after having read his interview and seeing his design work since leaving Werkplaats (Put About especially).

It is interesting that for a man who wants to remain so independent in his design thinking (worded loosely) that he is leaving the relative autonomy of the Netherlands. I thinkhe may ifnd working in New York difficult, but I'm looking forward to seeing what he can do with different surroundings.

Posted by: Derrick Schultz at March 5, 2006 06:17 AM

Hey sorry everybody... our MT thing went bust and we haven't been able to add new posts or comments for a week or so... but it's all good again now.

The WT book 'In Alphabetical Order' showed up (thanks Kim!). It was good timing cause we'd been getting bagged by certain people we'd run our editorial for TNG by for being overly personal. We were having a bit of a stress out about it when that book arrived, and reading Stuart's bit at the start just made go 'oh yeah that's right I really like that kind of quite personal casual-obsessive kind of writing...

What I thought was interesting though was how much I didn't like the 'founding texts' toward the back... well that's not entirely true... I quite liked Paul Elliman's and kind of liked Froshaug's. I hated the Robin Kinross one. The thing I find strange is that Stuart's writing is so casual 'I couldn't give a fuck'... which I appreciate (I like how he doesn't try and deify graphic design in any way), and it seems like worlds away from the other texts... maybe it's why most of the book seperates them?

Posted by: Luke at March 14, 2006 10:39 AM